Legislative Performance Index Logo

Legislative Performance Index

MembersMethodologyAboutExplore Grades
Back to Members
Official portrait of U.S. Representative Jasmine Crockett

Jasmine Crockett

Democrat • Texas District 30 • House • First Elected 2023

D
64/100
Overall LPI Score

What They Do Well

Jasmine Crockett shows strong early-career coalition building and meaningful district-level engagement, with 457 total cosponsors and 13 community project funding requests demonstrating active constituent service.

What Held Them Back

Limited legislative advancement and below-average attendance currently constrain her effectiveness under LPI standards. No sponsored bills have passed the House yet.

Score Breakdown

Productivity

10/25 points

10

Measures bills introduced, co-sponsored, and passed. Includes committee participation and voting consistency.

Cooperation

18/25 points

18

Evaluates bipartisan bill sponsorship, cross-party voting patterns, and collaborative legislative efforts.

Integrity

17/25 points

17

Tracks ethics violations, transparency compliance, attendance record, and financial disclosure adherence.

District Impact

19/25 points

19

Assesses federal funding secured, constituent services provided, town halls held, and local engagement.

Detailed Scoring Breakdown

Productivity (10 / 25)

roll Call Attendance
Missed ~3.8% of votes
2/5
bills Introduced
36 bills; above House median for tenure
4/5
bills Sponsored
38 primary bills; solid but not top-tier
3/5
bills Advanced
No sponsored bills passed the House
0/5
bills Enacted
No enacted legislation; baseline for active members
1/5

Cooperation (18 / 25)

bipartisan Index
No official Lugar score; estimated bottom-quartile range
2/5
cross Party Cosponsorship
11 of 22 bills bipartisan; above average for freshmen
4/5
intra Party Cosponsorship
Strong Democratic caucus support
4/5
total Cosponsors Accumulated
457 total cosponsors
4/5
unique Members Supporting
210 unique Members of Congress
4/5

Integrity (17 / 25)

corporate Pac Money
Accepted; moderate exposure
3/5
lobbyist Linked Funding
Some exposure via PACs
3/5
stock Ownership
Holds stock; not extensive
3/5
stock Trading Activity
Some disclosed trading activity
3/5
ethics Findings
No verified ethics violations
5/5

District Impact (19 / 25)

community Project Funding Requests
13 submitted requests
5/5
projects Advanced Through Committee
Majority advanced
4/5
funding Enacted
Early-stage; mixed outcomes
3/5
dollar Scale Substance
Major infrastructure and community projects
4/5
consistency Over Time
Early tenure with consistent engagement
3/5

Data Sources

Congress.govGovTrack.usLugar Center Bipartisan IndexOpenSecrets.orgUSAspending.govOfficial House Community Project Funding Disclosures

About These Scores

These scores are calculated using publicly available data from Congress.gov, official voting records, ethics reports, and federal spending databases. All metrics are objective and verifiable.

The LPI scoring system does not evaluate the ideological content of legislation or votes. A liberal and a conservative can both score highly if they are productive, collaborative, ethical, and effective at serving their constituents.

View Full Methodology
LPI LogoLegislative Performance Index
AboutMethodologyMembersContact
© 2025 Legislative Performance Index. All data is public domain.