Legislative Performance Index Logo

Legislative Performance Index

MembersMethodologyAboutExplore Grades
Back to Members
Official portrait of U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Republican • Georgia District 14 • House • First Elected 2021

D
63/100
Overall LPI Score

What They Do Well

Marjorie Taylor Greene shows strong district-level funding activity and legislative volume, demonstrating commitment to Georgia 14th District infrastructure and community projects.

What Held Them Back

Limited cooperation and repeated institutional conflicts significantly constrain effectiveness. Under LPI standards, local impact does not offset narrow coalition capacity.

Score Breakdown

Productivity

17/25 points

17

Measures bills introduced, co-sponsored, and passed. Includes committee participation and voting consistency.

Cooperation

7/25 points

7

Evaluates bipartisan bill sponsorship, cross-party voting patterns, and collaborative legislative efforts.

Integrity

16/25 points

16

Tracks ethics violations, transparency compliance, attendance record, and financial disclosure adherence.

District Impact

23/25 points

23

Assesses federal funding secured, constituent services provided, town halls held, and local engagement.

Detailed Scoring Breakdown

Productivity (17 / 25)

roll Call Attendance
Below House median (~4.4% missed)
3/5
bills Introduced
High volume
5/5
bills Sponsored
Extensive primary sponsorship
4/5
bills Advanced
Several advanced through House
3/5
bills Enacted
1 major bill enacted as primary sponsor
2/5

Cooperation (7 / 25)

bipartisan Index
Ranked 425 of 436 (Lugar Center)
0/5
cross Party Cosponsorship
Rare
1/5
intra Party Cosponsorship
Narrow factional alignment
2/5
total Cosponsors Accumulated
Moderate
3/5
unique Members Supporting
Limited outside ideological bloc
1/5

Integrity (16 / 25)

corporate Pac Money
None
5/5
lobbyist Linked Funding
Limited
4/5
stock Ownership
Large and diversified
2/5
stock Trading Activity
Frequent but compliant
3/5
ethics Findings
Repeated House fines and disciplinary actions reduce score
2/5

District Impact (23 / 25)

community Project Funding Requests
Numerous
5/5
projects Advanced Through Committee
Majority advanced through committee
5/5
funding Enacted
Multiple projects funded (often partially)
4/5
dollar Scale Substance
Significant district-level infrastructure and safety investments
4/5
consistency Over Time
Clear multi-year pattern
5/5

Data Sources

Congress.govGovTrack.usLugar Center Bipartisan IndexOpenSecrets.orgUSAspending.govOfficial House Community Project Funding Disclosures

About These Scores

These scores are calculated using publicly available data from Congress.gov, official voting records, ethics reports, and federal spending databases. All metrics are objective and verifiable.

The LPI scoring system does not evaluate the ideological content of legislation or votes. A liberal and a conservative can both score highly if they are productive, collaborative, ethical, and effective at serving their constituents.

View Full Methodology
LPI LogoLegislative Performance Index
AboutMethodologyMembersContact
© 2025 Legislative Performance Index. All data is public domain.